The Subordination of Women in Native Son

Throughout Native Son, Richard Wright inadequately develops gender issues and the role of gender in society: it is a blindspot of the novel. In the time period and location, several gender and race roles are put into place. White women are seen as pure and innocent. They are symbols of wealth and beauty, and are protected by white men. Somehow, a narrative is created that all black men are attracted to white women with dangerous and violent intentions. On the other hand, black women are completely forgotten and neglected: they don’t even get the chance for a stereotypical characterization.


I believe Bigger largely thinks of women in these gender roles, rather than as people themselves. When Bigger first kills Mary, he seems to feel no remorse for actually murdering an innocent woman. He immediately worries about how these actions might reflect on him as a Black man and how to save himself. On page 87, the narrator writes, “He was a murderer, a Negro murderer, a black murderer. He had killed a white woman. He had to get away from here.” Through these thoughts, Bigger is objectifying Mary. The only reason he cares so much about covering up his actions is because of her race. When he kills a Black woman, he barely thinks and discards her body, also like an object.


Throughout the novel, Wright uses Bessie as a prop. He does not give her any character development other than being Bigger’s girlfriend. Even when Bigger kills her, she is just used as a way to show Bigger’s character development - that he performs rash actions since he feels like he has nothing to lose. Even Bigger’s reason for killing her is to save himself since she won’t follow a plan to help him cover up killing a white woman. The writing of Bessie is primarily under Bigger’s control, as Bigger wants to separate her personality from her body.


During the trial, Bessie is once again subordinated because of her race and gender. Instead of getting her own justice for her rape and murder, she is simply used as evidence. Black women are seen as useless unless in the context of convicting a Black man or giving justice to a white woman. Although to a lesser degree, Mary also seems to be used as a bit of a prop since Buckley and Max seemed more concerned over convicting/saving a Black man instead of worrying about Mary and her family. The race tension of Black and white people in society seems to outweigh all other tensions.


Overall, women’s rights never see a spotlight in this novel. The fact that the primary purpose and fate of the main two women in this novel is to be killed shows that the general culture in this time does not value women for anything they can really offer. Their deaths are primarily used to enhance Bigger’s narrative and make a comment on the system that produces Black men. Throughout their lives, these women are subordinated by men, and they die in the same way.

Comments

  1. I really agree with what you've said here. I think it is a huge issue how women are treated in this novel, and the complete neglect and abandonment of Bessie as a human being is upsetting to read. I like how you say that black women "don't even get a chance for a stereo typical characterization," because I think that explains the situation really well. Bessie's story isn't fleshed out as an ignored, disrespected person, it's just not there at all. She is only used in the novel for other people. I think this is a really good blog post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not sure if it's a blindspot so much as commentary on Wright's part? Especially the part where Bessie is used as evidence at the trial, I believe the text pretty directly calls that out. In general I just don't agree that writing a sexist character means the author is sexist. Certainly this book isn't what you should read if you want something empowering for women/black women or something that explores gender issues in depth, but I think the book can have a different focus without being sexist. Bigger is definitely sexist but I'm not convinced the book is

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's also clear that he is only with Bessie because he thinks he should have a girlfriend, rather than because he actually enjoys her company or respects her as a person. And I also think that even Mary is portrayed as pretty shallow. She's a communist but doesn't seem to really be in it for the right reasons, and doesn't seem to completely understand the deeper meaning behind communism and capitalism and racism. Jan on the other hand seems to be pretty down-to-earth and smart, so I do think that Wright is bad at writing female characters.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree, and I think the juxtaposition you proposed between Mary and other white women in Native Son vs. Bessie and Mrs. Thomas really drives home the point. The book does nothing to break from the stereotypes of white women being kind and innocent, with Mary "just wanting to help Bigger" but being too ignorant to see she is making him uncomfortable. Bessie however isn't even given an identity besides being Bigger's girlfriend. All his female characters fall straight into the stereotypes of the time based on their race.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think you give a lot of really clear examples of what you're talking about here. The different women in this book are all treated very differently by the book (and that seems to sort of vary based on race) but it's true across the board that Wright treats his female characters differently to his male ones, and I think your examples make that very clear.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree that the novel does poorly in its depiction of women. It seems like in the scene where Bessie's body is being used in court, Wright does try to make a point about society's prioritization of white women over black women. However, the fact that this point is so brief in a novel that subordinates women throughout really prevents the novel from making any meaningful commentary about gender and intersectionality.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts